Do organic waste bans and composting programs really take a bite out of food waste?

by Jodi Helmer

Published: 3/17/25, Last updated: 3/17/25

You know the stats: Americans toss almost 60 billion tons of food annually — more than any other nation — and most of it goes to the landfill where it makes up 22 percent of municipal solid waste and generates 11 percent of global methane emissions.

Concerns about food waste might be the main reason you scrape leftovers into the compost bin or recycle overripe bananas, moldy bread and spent eggshells via a municipal composting program. These concerns are also what have driven the creation of 400 municipal food waste-collection programs for residential customers. For certain residential and business customers in ten states — California, Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington — recycling food scraps is more than just an environmental prerogative; it’s the law.

Food waste bans have had mixed results so far. In California, legislation helped divert 2 million tons of organic waste from landfills from 2018 to 2021, and more than 380,000 tons of food waste are diverted annually as a result of organics bans in Massachusetts. But in Vermont, the percentage of food scraps as a volume of waste in the landfill decreased less than 1 percent after the food waste-disposal ban went into effect. Moreover, 12 percent of households reported putting their scraps in the garbage disposal, equal to an estimated 3,588 tons of food waste that ends up in wastewater treatment plants. Depending on how those plants deal with the solids in the sewage, that food waste could be fermented in an anaerobic digester that captures methane emissions, but it could also just end up in a landfill where those emissions enter the atmosphere. And even if the food waste is digested, the resulting compost could still be hazardous to use if the wastewater is contaminated with PFAS.

Despite a growing number of food waste bans and food waste-recycling programs, a new study published in “Nature Food” that used data from ReFED — a nonprofit that identifies food waste-recycling solutions — showed that state-level food waste policies are falling far short of the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 2030 Food Loss and Waste Reduction Goal. In fact, the amount of food waste generated has increased. An overemphasis on food recycling and composting programs may be to blame.

Overemphasis on recycling

Managing food waste is not the same thing as reducing food waste from the outset. Strategies like meal planning, purchasing smaller quantities, using about-to-expire foods and eating leftovers — as well as commercial strategies like better managing ordering and inventory — result in fewer food scraps that are sent to the landfill or need to be composted. It’s an important distinction, one that gets lost when composting programs get most of the focus.

Composting food scraps is one of the simplest food waste-reduction strategies to enact, according to Josh Kelly, solid waste program manager for the Vermont Agency of National Resources.

“Reduction and reuse are complicated; they’re hard to measure, hard to track and hard to enforce,” Kelly says. “So, we start with food waste often from a point of regulating composting facilities or requiring that food waste goes to a place that’s an alternative to a landfill.”

These waste-diversion methods might be relatively easy for people to adopt, but even properly composted food is still technically wasted because it wasn’t eaten. In light of this, in 2021, the EPA changed how it measured food waste; it began counting food scraps going to compost and anaerobic digestion as part of the problem, not part of the solution toward its 2030 goal.

“Recycling solutions are no longer considered as waste reduction,” says Sarah Kakadellis, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher at UC Davis and coauthor of the study in “Nature Food.”  “But that doesn’t mean that they’re not important.”

Composting and other recycling solutions are still a valuable way to reduce emissions that come from wasted food while producing useful byproducts. Kakadellis notes that states are pushing for more facilities for anaerobic digestion. This process, which breaks down food waste in sealed tanks using specialized bacteria, requires less space than oxygen-dependent (i.e. aerobic) methods like composting, and can therefore accommodate more food waste. It also captures methane gas that can be burned for energy, repurposing greenhouse gases that would otherwise escape into the atmosphere. But, she adds, when we go that route “we are not directly contributing to the food waste-reduction goal.”

Prioritizing prevention

More than one-third of food produced is unsold or uneaten and just a small portion of that is donated. Instead, it becomes food waste and has an enormous impact on the environment. The sheer volume of wasted food led ReFED to call the food system “radically inefficient.”

When food is wasted, all of the resources used to produce, process, transport and store it are wasted, too. That accounts for at least 15 percent of annual global fossil fuel use — generating emissions equivalent to those of Russia and all countries in the European Union combined. The outsized environmental impact of food production and processing necessitates a holistic approach to food waste reduction.

Kakadellis believes there’s traction with adopting a strong narrative around composting or recycling food waste because it’s easy and convenient, but adds, “It doesn’t require us to think about our wasting behavior; it doesn’t require us to think about how to better manage our food. … It doesn’t require us to think about how to optimize that supply chain or how to prevent and identify where to reduce food waste at the source.”

States that depend on recycling to fight food waste, including those that introduced bans on disposing of food scraps in landfills, are less successful in reducing waste than states that take a more comprehensive approach (for example, one that might include education programs around prevention or legislation to adjust food labeling/best-by dates).

“[Food waste] recycling is important in the sense that anaerobic digestion of food and organic waste in landfills creates methane, and methane is really destructive,” says Asch Harwood, vice president of data and insights for ReFED. “But … preventing that excess food from being created is really important.”

“If we want to prioritize emission reduction, we’ve got to focus on prevention and then rescue and getting as much food as possible back into the food chain to feed people."

Asch Harwood

Vice president of data and insights for ReFED

States like California and Washington that emphasize surplus food prevention and distribution, and that offer liability protections for food donations along with food waste recycling, have the greatest potential to divert food waste from the landfill, according to the UC Davis study.

“If we want to prioritize emission reduction, we’ve got to focus on prevention and then rescue and getting as much food as possible back into the food chain to feed people,” Harwood says. “We need a systems-level approach.”

Kelly acknowledges that a holistic approach is essential, but he worries that reports questioning the value of food waste bans and food recycling sow skepticism, which could thwart progress. A similar issue arose, he says, with plastics recycling.

“Skepticism can flip to cynicism,” Kelly says. “With recycling, people [started thinking], ‘Screw it; I’m not going to recycle because none of it gets recycled.’ Food waste recycling is not the be all, end all — but that doesn’t mean it’s exclusionary of food waste reduction.”

Rather than discouraging food waste recycling, Kakadellis hopes that understanding its limitations will lead to more effective policies and shift the narrative toward food waste reduction as a necessary first step.

“Recycling is important, but it’s only part of the story,” she says. “We need to shift the conversation to more upstream thinking about how we prevent food waste from happening in the first place.”

Top photo by ArieStudio/Adobe Stock.

More Reading

What is Europe getting right about food waste in schools?

November 15, 2024

Municipal composting has increased, but what does that really mean?

May 16, 2024

6 upcycled food trends to watch

February 13, 2024

Food scholar Darra Goldstein on the culinary history of preservation

October 30, 2023

Candying is the sweetest way to prevent food waste

October 12, 2023

Colleges have high rates of food insecurity and food waste. Students are helping address both.

October 4, 2023

The FoodPrint Guide to Freezing

August 3, 2023

How to Prevent Garden Food Waste

July 11, 2023

Create Less Waste and More Color in Your Kitchen with Natural Dyes

April 27, 2023