Our industrial agricultural system relies heavily on pesticides, which control weeds, kill insects and stave off fungi. More than 1.1 billion pounds of pesticides are applied annually to crops in the US1, mostly in combination with seeds that are genetically engineered to withstand them. The escalating use of pesticides in recent decades has become a public health hazard, an environmental disaster and has even caused the evolution of “superweeds,” which require increasingly toxic pesticide formulas to kill. Consumers can help reduce the demand for products grown with pesticides by purchasing organic or low-spray produce and by joining organizations fighting against the powerful multi-billion-dollar pesticide industry.

What Are Pesticides?

Industrial agriculture relies on two types of chemicals: fertilizers and pesticides. The former boost soil fertility, making crops more productive, while the latter protect crops by controlling weeds (herbicides), insect and animal infestation (insecticides and rodenticides) and fungal/mold diseases (fungicides).2

Pesticides come in a variety of formulations, depending on their target and purpose. For example, fumigants are applied as gases to the soil, and “systemic” pesticides are absorbed by leaves before spreading through the rest of the plant. Not all pesticides and formulations are created equal — some chemicals can harm a wide variety of non-target species, and some application methods have high potential to drift off target. This means that pesticides can cause harm to the wider ecosystem, instead of just their intended targets. This presents a real risk for biodiversity and environmental health.

A Brief History of Pesticide Use

Pesticides are not a modern invention. Ancient Sumerians used elemental sulfur to protect crops from insects, and medieval farmers and scientists experimented with chemicals like arsenic. Nineteenth-century research focused on compounds made from plants, including chrysanthemum. In 1939, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, better known as DDT, was discovered to be extremely effective against both agricultural and disease-carrying insects. It rapidly became the most widely used insecticide in the world. Twenty plus years later, shortly after Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring shed light on the devastating effects of DDT on the environment, serious concerns about its impact on human and animal health led the US and 80 more countries to ban its use. The book also galvanized the environmental movement and the creation of the EPA, which is still responsible for monitoring pesticide use.3

As agriculture has grown and industrialized, farmers have come to rely on pesticides for large-scale practices such as monocropping — growing one crop in great quantities, season after season, on the same land. Despite the widespread recognition that pesticides are harmful to human and environmental health, our industrial agricultural system depends on their continued use.

Why Use Pesticides?

For farmers, pesticides save labor and generally provide a higher yield: they can mean the difference between saving a crop and losing it to disease. Some farmers, especially those who grow produce at a smaller scale, use pesticides sparingly. For example, fruit trees are susceptible to disease in northeastern regions, especially at the blossom stage. An apple or peach grower may spray their fruit trees with a fungicide once in the spring to ensure that the fruit sets, but use no further chemicals for the rest of the season.

For many large row crop farmers, on the other hand, regular pesticide use is as much a part of farming as planting seeds. Spraying Roundup on a field of corn genetically engineered to withstand the chemical kills the weeds without affecting the corn. In comparison to mechanically weeding hundreds or thousands of acres, using pesticides is a game-changer. Some farmers spray their wheat with a weed-killer at the end of the season to speed its drying process and prevent losses from wet weather later in the season. Farmers growing fruit or vegetables on a large scale, especially delicate varieties like strawberries, will blanket the field with pesticides to ward off any possible disease.

90%

More than 90% of corn, soybeans and cotton in the US are genetically modified to be resistant to herbicides.

The carpet-bombing approach to pesticide use is a hard habit to break. Decades of using pesticides as the first and only line of defense mean that older, traditional knowledge and skills about pest and weed management have been lost, which leaves farmers out of options if and when the chemicals fail. Buying equipment and investing time and labor costs into alternative pest control methods can be restrictive for many farmers, especially those who have heavily invested in engineered seeds and pesticides.

Pesticide Use in the US and Worldwide

The most recent report on pesticide sales and use from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) puts US pesticide use at 1.1 billion pounds in both 2011 and 2012, which amounts to 23 percent of the nearly six billion pounds used worldwide. 4 Agriculture accounts for nearly 90 percent of pesticides in the US, with industry/commercial/government and home and garden use making up the rest.

The Link Between Herbicides and GMOs

Herbicides are the most common type of pesticide used, accounting for almost 90 percent of the pesticides used by the agriculture sector.5 Monsanto, an agrochemical company now owned by Bayer, is well known for its line of “Roundup Ready” seeds, which are resistant to glyphosate, the main ingredient in the herbicide “Roundup”. The combination of the two products allows farmers to spray entire fields with glyphosate without fear of losing their main crop. This makes pest control on crops like corn and soy easy for farmers, and the technology has been very popular — herbicide-resistant seeds account for more than 90% of corn, cotton, and soybeans planted today, 6, and the volume of glyphosate used in the US increased tenfold from 15 million pounds in 1996 to 159 million pounds in 2012. 7

Terms to Know
Glyphosate
The active ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, which was made by Monsanto (now owned by Bayer). It is by far the most widely used pesticide in the world. It can now be found in the majority of rivers, streams, ditches and wastewater treatment plants, as well as in 70 percent of rainfall samples.

A Powerful Industry

The agricultural chemical companies and their trade associations (with names like CropLife), motivated by profit, are highly invested in keeping farmers reliant on pesticides. Pesticides are a $14 billion industry in the US; two-thirds are for agricultural use. Most of those sales are herbicides paired with genetically modified seeds, but these numbers do not include sales of the seed itself. In 2017, Monsanto’s net sales of genetically engineered (GE) corn, soybean and cotton seeds and associated GE technologies totaled $9.5 billion. 8

As the industry has exploded, the companies involved have grown and merged. What started out as six major agricultural chemical companies had, by 2018, merged into just three: DowDuPont, ChemChina and Syngenta and Bayer/Monsanto. 9 This much control concentrated in a few mega-corporations means fewer options for farmers, as well as higher prices — and increasing political power for the companies.

Political Power of the Agrochemical Industry

The agrochemical industry has been politically powerful for many years. 10 As a bloc, the agricultural inputs sector spent nearly $33 million in lobbying Congress in 2016. 11 The “revolving door,” by which former industry leaders serve in the government agencies overseeing their industries, is well-used by agribusiness, mainly to keep regulation of pesticides and other agricultural products and practices extremely limited. 121314

The ag chemical industry also influences the scientific research that guides policy-making: as public spending on agricultural research and development has been cut precipitously, industry now funds a much larger share. 1516 This means that they may decide not to investigate certain issues or may withhold results that are unfavorable to their products. 17 The best-known example is the debate around the herbicide atrazine; independent research frequently shows it is harmful to wildlife, while industry-funded research consistently finds no negative consequences. 18 In this case, this has led the EPA to reverse guidelines on atrazine use several times, with tolerances currently well above what researchers believe are harmful.

The Impact of Pesticides on the Environment

The FoodPrint of Crops

For in-depth information on crop production and its sustainability issues, read our report, The FoodPrint of Crops.

Learn More

The outcry following the publication of the 1962 book Silent Spring — which documented the detrimental environmental effects of overuse of pesticides — resulted in DDT being banned in the US and created an awareness of how pesticides can impact the wider environment. Pesticides that are sprayed on crops leave a residue on the dead plant material that settles into the soil and can run off into waterways or leach into groundwater. A 2014 study performing tests across 38 states found glyphosate in the majority of rivers, streams, ditches and wastewater treatment plants, as well as in 70 percent of rainfall samples. 19 Even at levels deemed safe, pesticides have been shown to cause a loss of biodiversity, including reduced numbers of beneficial insects, as well as birds and amphibians. 20 The EPA maintains a list of the potential effects of pesticides on aquatic life and other animals as a reference for researchers investigating water quality. 21 Some pesticides, such as atrazine, may not usually be present in quantities to kill wildlife outright, but they can still disrupt breeding and cause serious damage to aquatic foodwebs.

Terms to Know
Atrazine
A widely used herbicide on corn and other crops. Atrazine is especially prone to running off targeted plants and ending up in rivers, lakes and groundwater, where it can harm aquatic plants and disrupt the reproduction and growth of amphibians and fish.

Pesticides and Pollinator Decline

In addition to endangering wild ecosystems, insecticides also cause problems on the farm — many of these species are important pollinators for fruit, nut, and vegetable crops. Neonicotinoids (or neonics), a popular class of pesticides that attack the nervous system of insects, have grown in popularity since the 1990s due to their comparatively low toxicity to mammals and humans. However, a widening body of research links neonics to decline of wild and domesticated pollinators; bumblebee colonies exposed to neonics in controlled trials grew more slowly and produced fewer queens than those without exposure 22 and experiments in honey bees have found neonics reduce impair learning and communication. 23 Even more concerningly, honey bees seem to prefer food sources that contain neonic residues.24 Neonics aren’t the sole reason honey bee colonies are collapsing, but when combined with the other stressors colonies face in our industrialized food system, like varroa mites, being moved hundreds of miles to pollinate different crops, and huge, monocultured biodiversity deserts, they pose a serious threat. While the EPA banned 12 neonic formulations in 2019, many more remain on the market. 25

Pesticide Resistance

Another on-farm problem stemming from over-reliance on pesticides is the evolution of pesticide resistance in insects, weeds, and diseases. Like all living things, weed and pest populations evolve over time. When farmers repeatedly apply the same pesticides, they eliminate most of the population that’s susceptible to the chemical. However, natural genetic variation means that occasional individual pests might be resistant to the pesticide and survive. When the same pesticides are applied year after year on a massive scale, these resistant individuals quickly multiply until the whole population is resistant to the pesticide.

Weeds that have evolved resistance to multiple herbicides, termed “superweeds,” pose a serious threat to farmers who find their fields overrun with weeds they lack the tools and the knowledge to kill. Herbicide resistance is increasingly common, and some areas may have multiple herbicide-resistant weed species in their fields, making weed control even more difficult.26 In just the US, scientists have already discovered 25 species of weeds that have grown resistant to herbicides. 27

With annual US losses estimated at $10 billion, pesticide resistance is an expensive problem for American farmers. 28Rather than addressing the root causes of resistance, however, agrichemical companies simply release new formulations of multiple herbicides. Sometimes, these new formulations contain older, more hazardous chemicals like dicamba, atrazine, and 2,4-D. These reformulations can lead to massive increases in the amount of chemicals sprayed on crops — the newly approved combination of glyphosate and 2,4-D, for example is expected to lead to a 300 to 700 percent increase in the chemical’s use by 2020. 29

In addition to keeping farmers on a kind of treadmill of buying new formulations of pesticides, pesticide resistance can have serious off-farm consequences. For example, overuse of insecticides can cause non-target species to develop resistance as well—just as antibiotic abuse on industrial farms puts the public at risk by encouraging antibiotic-resistant infections, there’s evidence that agricultural insecticides have contributed to the spread of insecticide-resistant mosquitoes. This poses a huge difficulty for public health professionals trying to prevent malaria and other diseases.30

Terms to Know
2,4-D
A toxic chemical that was a major component in Agent Orange, the infamous defoliant developed by Monsanto and used in the Vietnam War. In some formulations, it can cause major health problems for farmworkers and poses serious risks to aquatic life.

Pesticide Drift

Depending on how they’re applied, some pesticides can drift off target and damage other crops. For example, dicamba, which was previously approved only for ground spreading, was EPA-approved in 2017 for aerial spraying in conjunction with soybean seeds genetically engineered to be resistant to the chemical. While farmers were optimistic that dicamba would be a useful tool against glyphosate-resistant superweeds, the situation quickly soured; dicamba is extremely volatile: even when applied according to label instructions, it can turn back into gas and drift several miles, killing or damaging any plant material wherever it lands. In this case, dicamba drift damaged 3.6 million acres of non-resistant soybeans in neighboring fields, as well as vegetables, fruits, and trees in 25 states. 31

Terms to Know
Dicamba
Dicamba was EPA-approved in 2017 for aerial spraying in conjunction with GE soybean seeds that are resistant to the chemical. Dicamba can drift off of fields to kill or damage neighboring farmers' crops. The damage from dicamba drift is widespread and has been reported in 25 states.

If a farmer chooses not to grow pesticide-resistant crops and a neighboring farm’s pesticide drifts over, it can damage or ruin that farmer’s crop, causing bitter conflict among farming communities. Rather than rejecting this damaging chemical altogether and sanctioning the seed and chemical manufacturer for bad practices, the soybean growers decided instead to plant dicamba-resistant seeds; this has further expanded the use of the herbicide, benefiting the bottom line of the seed and chemical manufacturer, and also increasing the possibilities of dicamba drift. Even organic agriculture is impacted by pesticide drift: in addition to causing crop losses, pesticide drift can cause organic crops to test positive for pesticide residues and ruin a neighboring farm’s organic certification, which limits farmers’ ability to be fairly compensated for the higher costs of cleaner production.

The Impact of Pesticide Use on Public Health

Pesticides also pose serious risks to human health and safety. Because of their widespread use, people in every part of our food system — producers, workers and consumers — can be exposed to potentially harmful levels of pesticides.

As part of the approval process for new pesticides, the EPA assesses possible health impacts, drafts usage guidelines and establishes tolerances, or amounts allowed on or in a food. 32 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and USDA annually survey and publish information regarding pesticide residues in the food supply.33 34 However, many EPA-designated tolerance levels may not fully account for a range of health risks, such as hormone (or, endocrine) disruption. 35

Pesticides and Farmworkers

The people most at risk from pesticides are the farmworkers who apply them and who work in the fields where they are used. While the federal government regulates how pesticides are used and sets guidelines to limit exposures, these guidelines aren’t always followed. For example, farmworkers may not be given required protective equipment, or could be forced to work on recently-sprayed fields with unabsorbed pesticides. Since many of the farmworkers in the US are undocumented immigrants with limited English skills, they may not be given appropriate training or be able to understand warning signage, and they may even be pressured into working in unsafe conditions. These barriers also mean that incidents of pesticide poisoning in farmworkers often go untreated—workers experiencing poisoning from chlorpyrifos, for example, might just think they have a bad case of the flu.36

Terms to Know
Chlorpyrifos
An organophosphate insecticide descended from chemical warfare agents like Sarin and VX. Farmworkers exposed to chlorpyrifos in the field can experience dizziness, muscle weakness and seizures. Chlorpyrifos has also been linked to neurological disorders in children and adults, and is banned in the EU and several states.

Farmworkers who are victims of pesticide poisoning may also lack the financial and legal resources to report incidents, so they often go uncompensated. The fact that these incidents are often underreported also means the real impact of pesticides is underestimated in public health research that influences policy and legislation.37

Health Problems Associated with Long-Term Exposure to Pesticides

In addition to acute poisoning from field exposures, pesticides can also cause longer-term health impacts for workers and consumers, and even people who live around farms where they are used. Chlorpyrifos and other organophosphates, for example, are harmful to brain function and are associated with preterm births and neurological disorders among people working on farms and living in agricultural areas. Studies have concluded that the pesticide is especially dangerous to children, even in utero. 3839 Given the magnitude of evidence showing the impact to human health, and the decision of the EPA to delay banning the pesticide, three US states — New York, California and Hawai’i — have moved to ban the use of chlorpyrifos. 40

Other pesticides, like endocrine disruptors, have been linked to low birthweight, abnormal brain development, increased incidence of cancers and reduced fertility among people who live in agricultural areas.41 Even legally approved pesticides can be carcinogens; a 2010 report by the President’s Cancer Panel concluded that pesticides were associated with numerous types of cancers, including brain, pancreatic, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, myeloma, colon, testicular and soft tissue sarcoma.42

Glyphosate and Possible Cancer Risks

There is ongoing debate about possible cancer risks of glyphosate. In 2015, the World Health Organization analyzed the existing research on glyphosate and classed it “probably carcinogenic,” having found some evidence of an increased prevalence for non-Hodgkin lymphoma after glyphosate exposure. 43 However, a similar EPA declared glyphosate as unlikely to be a carcinogen. 44 The EPA analysis incorporated research from additional sources, including unpublished data that was provided directly from Monsanto itself. This was excluded by WHO’s standard of only using publicly available data, and cast doubts on the EPA findings’ legitimacy. 45

Determining if substances are carcinogenic is complicated, and part of this difficulty comes from the types of studies used in the process. While experiments using cells or animals in a lab setting may show that glyphosate can cause cancer, other studies focus on whether or not cancer is a likely, real-life outcome. In this case, a supplement to the WHO declaration concluded that glyphosate is “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans from exposure through the diet” but recommended further study given their finding that it could cause cancer in mice at high doses. 46 It’s important to note that observational and associational research, which observe correlations between factors without performing experiments, are categorized as “weaker evidence” in these types of assessments and don’t get much weight. However, they can still point to concerning connections that aren’t always picked up in lab studies. In Sri Lanka, for example, researchers found a high correlation between glyphosate use, water contamination, and kidney damage. 47 So while it looks unlikely that glyphosate residues in food directly cause cancer in consumers, there’s plenty of cause for further investigation of health impacts. In spite of the unsettled science, several recent court cases have found Monsanto liable for life-threatening illnesses among people who had extended exposure to the chemical, and there are thousands of similar lawsuits in progress. However, the EPA filed a brief in support of Monsanto in one of the largest cases, restating their own findings of no harm – given the size of the companies involved and the huge role glyphosate plays on American farms, it’s unlikely the legal battles will end soon. 48

Limiting Pesticide Intake

While USDA testing consistently finds that nearly all food samples have pesticide residues, the levels are typically well below the tolerance levels established by the EPA. However, these tolerances are set for individual pesticides; in reality, residues from multiple pesticides are often found together in the same foods, and the way that these residues interact is unclear. 49 Recent analysis by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) showed that 70 percent of produce samples were contaminated with pesticide residues. The type and amount of residue found on food can depend on many factors, like how the pesticides were applied, and whether or not the foods had a thick peel. 50

Since consumers can’t always see how their food is produced, the EWG’s annual Dirty Dozen and Clean Fifteen lists provide details about what foods have the most and least pesticide residues. Eating lots of fresh produce is an important part of a healthy diet, but that doesn’t have to mean ingesting lots of pesticide residues. Tools like the Dirty Dozen can help consumers know what foods they should prioritize buying organically-grown to minimize their exposure to pesticides.

Alternatives to Pesticides

Reducing or eliminating pesticide use requires careful ecosystem management, using crop rotations and good soil health practices to build a population of beneficial microorganisms, insects and plants that will do the work of warding off diseases and weeds. Small changes can have a big impact; a 2012 Iowa study, for example, found that simply adding an additional crop such as oats into the common rotation of corn and soybeans allowed farmers to use far less herbicide for weed control and to dramatically cut water contamination, while maintaining similar yields. 51

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) embraces a continuum of practices among farms of all sizes, beginning with identifying pests before spraying. For instance, an IPM farm may grow pest-resistant crop varieties, use predatory insects to kill plant-eating pests, employ mechanical pest traps and eliminate pest nesting areas. 52 If further control is needed, IPM farmers would employ a targeted approach, using broadcast spraying only as a last resort.

Other techniques used by sustainable farms to reduce the need for pesticides include planting cover crops, strategically timing weeding and tilling, and starting crops early or late to outcompete weeds. All of these decisions take careful observation of the on-farm ecosystem, and many of them require more labor than just spraying a pesticide. This is part of the reason sustainably produced food is sometimes more expensive on the supermarket shelf.

What You Can Do

Farming that does not rely on chemical pesticides requires more specialized knowledge, time and labor on the part of the farmer; thus, the products are often more expensive. As a consumer, if you can afford the extra cost, you are making an investment in a healthier agricultural system for everyone. Purchase organic and sustainably produced foods at your local farmers’ markets or farms, where you can ask the farmer directly about his or her pest control methods.

  • Check out our Food Label Guide for more information on the best labels to look for when shopping for foods grown with fewer pesticides.
  • Reduce your exposure to pesticide residues by washing all produce under running water, including items labeled organic.
  • Check out the Environmental Working Group’s Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce™ to find out what produce items were found to contain pesticide residues.
  • Get involved with an organization that is actively working to curb pesticide use while also working with farmers, such as Pesticide Action Network or Beyond Pesticides.
  • Let your legislators know you’re opposed to chlorpyrifos and that you have concerns about the safety of glyphosate and other commonly used pesticides.

Hide References

  1. Atwood, Donald and Paisley-Jones, Claire. “Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2008-2012 Market Estimates.” Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-01/documents/pesticides-industry-sales-usage-2016_0.pdf
  2. US Environmental Protection Agency. “Why We Use Pesticides.” EPA, June 27, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2018, from https://www.epa.gov/safepestcontrol/why-we-use-pesticides
  3. United States Environmental Protection Agency. “DDT – A Brief History and Status.” EPA, (n.d.). Retrieved May 28, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/ddt-brief-history-and-status
  4. Atwood, Donald and Paisley-Jones, Claire. “Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage: 2008-2012 Market Estimates.” Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-01/documents/pesticides-industry-sales-usage-2016_0.pdf
  5. Ibid.
  6. The Cornucopia Institute. “Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S.” USDA Economic Research Service, July 7, 2011. Retrieved April 19, 2019, from https://www.cornucopia.org/2011/07/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-u-s/.
  7. Food & Water Watch. “Superweeds: How Biotech crops bolster the pesticide industry.” FWW, 2013. Retrieved May 11, 2016, from https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/sites/default/files/Superweeds%20Report%20July%20201
  8. Statista. “Monsanto’s net sales in the seeds and genomics segment from 2011 to 2017 specialty (in million U.S. dollars)*.” Statista, 2019. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/276279/monsanto-seed-and-genomics-segment-net-sales/
  9. Shields, Michael. “ChemChina clinches landmark $43 billion takeover of Syngenta.” Reuters, May 5, 2017. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-syngenta-ag-m-a-chemchina/chemchina-clinches-landmark-43-billion-takeover-of-syngenta-idUSKBN1810CU
  10. Mulkern, Anne C. “Pesticide Industry Ramps Up Lobbying in Bid to Pare EPA Rules.” The New York Times Archives, February 24, 2011. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/02/24/24greenwire-pesticide-industry-ramps-up-lobbying-in-bid-to-42970.html?pagewanted=all
  11. Open Secrets. “Agricultural Services/Products.” Open Secrets, 2016. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indusclient.php?id=A07&year=2016
  12. Open Secrets. “Revolving Door.” Open Secrets, (n.d.). Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/index.php
  13. Pesticide Action Network. “Undue Influence.” PAN, (n.d.). Retrieved May 30, 2019, from http://www.panna.org/resources/undue-influence
  14. Food & Water Watch. “Food and Agriculture Biotechnology Industry Spends More Than Half a Billion Dollars to Influence Congress.” FWW, November 17, 2010. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/insight/food-and-agriculture-biotechnology-industry-spends-more-half-billion-dollars-influence
  15. Clancy, Matthew et al. “U.S. Agricultural R&D in an Era of Falling Public Funding.” USDA Economic Research Service, November 10, 2016. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/november/us-agricultural-rd-in-an-era-of-falling-public-funding/
  16. McCulskey Molly. “Public Universities Get an Education in Private Industry.” The Atlantic, April 3, 2017. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/04/public-universities-get-an-education-in-private-industry/521379/ 
  17. Aviv, Rachel. “A Valuable Reputation.” The New Yorker, February 2, 2014. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/02/10/a-valuable-reputation
  18. Boone et al. “Pesticide Regulation amid the Influence of Industry.” BioScience 64 (10): 917-922 (October 2014). Retrieved December 18, 2019, from https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/64/10/917/1782021
  19. Battaglin, WA. “Glyphosate and Its Degradation Product AMPA Occur Frequently and Widely in US Soils, Surface Water, Groundwater, and Precipitation.” Journal of The American Water Resources Association, Vol. 50, No. 2 p. 275-290 (2014). Retrieved December 1, 2017, from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jawr.12159/abstract
  20. Oosthoek, Sharon. “Pesticides spark broad biodiversity loss.” Nature, June 17, 2013. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.nature.com/news/pesticides-spark-broad-biodiversity-loss-1.13214
  21. US Environmental Protection Agency. “CADDIS Volume 2: Herbicides.” EPA, (n.d.) Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/caddis-vol2/caddis-volume-2-sources-stressors-responses-herbicides
  22. Whitehorn et al. “Neonicotinoid Pesticide Reduces Bumble Bee Colony Growth and Queen Production” Science 336 (6079): 351-352 (April 2012). Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://science.sciencemag.org/content/336/6079/351
  23. Hladik, Michael L., Main, Anson R., and Goulson, Dave. “Environmental Risks and Challenges Associated with Neonicotinoid Insecticides.” Environmental Science and Technology 52 (6): 3329-3335 (February 2018).
  24. Kessler et al. “Bees Prefer Food Containing Neonicotinoid Pesticides.” Nature 521: 74-75 (2015). Retrieved December 9, 2019, from https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14414
  25. Retrieved 9 December, 2019, from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-05-20/pdf/2019-10447.pdf
  26. Benbrook, Charles M. (2016). Trends in glyphosate use in US and globally. Environmental Sciences Europe, 28(1): 3. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5044953/
  27. Heap, I. “The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds.” Weed Science, June 13, 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from http://www.weedscience.org/
  28. Gould, Fred, Brown, Zachary S., and Kuzama, Jennifer. “Wicked Evolution: Can We Address the Sociobiological Dilemma of Pesticide Resistance?” Science 360 (6390): 728-732 (May 2018). Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6390/728/tab-pdf
  29. Grossman, Elizabeth. “5 Things to Know About 2,4-D, the ‘Possibly’ Dangerous Cancer-Causing Herbicide.” Civil Eats, June 30, 2015. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://civileats.com/2015/06/30/5-things-to-know-about-24-d-the-possibly-cancer-causing-herbicide/
  30. Mouhamadou et al. “Evidence of Insecticide Resistance in Wild Anopheles coluzzii Mosquitoes due to Agricultural Pesticide Use.” Infectious Diseases of Poverty 8: 64 (July 2019). Retrieved December 10, 2019, from https://idpjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40249-019-0572-2
  31. Lipton, Eric. “Crops in 25 States Damaged by Unintended Drift of Weed Killer.” The New York Times, November 1, 2017. Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/business/soybeans-pesticide.html
  32. US Environmental Protection Agency. “Regulation of Pesticide Residues on Food.” EPA, (n.d.). Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-tolerances
  33. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. “Pesticide Data Program.” USDA, (n.d.) Retrieved December 14, 2017, from https://www.ams.usda.gov/datasets/pdp
  34. USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service. “Residue Chemistry: Residue Testing; National Residue Program.” USDA, 2017. Retrieved December 14, 2017, from http://www.fsis.usda.gov/residue
  35. United Nations Environment Programme. “State of Science of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals 2012: Summary for Decision Makers.” World Health Organization, 2012. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/78102/WHO_HSE_PHE_IHE_2013.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1
  36.   “Exposed and Ignored” Farmworker Justice. Farmworker Justice, 2013. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://www.farmworkerjustice.org/sites/default/files/aExposed%20and%20Ignored%20by%20Farmworker%20Justice%20singles%20compressed.pdf
  37. Ibid
  38. Beyond Pesticides. “Widely used pesticide in food production damages children’s brains.” Pesticides and You, 16-19, Winter 2017-2018. Retrieved from https://beyondpesticides.org/assets/media/documents/bp-37.4-w17-Chlorpyrifos.pdf
  39. Rauh, V. et al. “Prenatal exposure to the organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos and childhood tremor.” NeuroToxicology, Vol. 51, 80-86 (December 2015). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4809635/
  40. CBS News. “California to ban controversial pesticide blamed for harming child brain development.” CBS, May 8, 2019. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-bans-chlorpyrifos-pesticide-agriculture-state-child-brain-development/
  41. Mnif et al. “Effect of Endocrine Disruptor Pesticides: A Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(6): 2265-2303 (June 2011). Retrieved May 28, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3138025/
  42. Leffall, LaSalle D. and Kripke, Margaret L. “Reducing environmental cancer risk: What we can do now.” US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health, National Cancer Institute, President’s Cancer Panel (April 2010). Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/annualreports/pcp08-09rpt/pcp_report_08-09_508.pdf
  43. International Agency for Research on Cancer. “IARC Monographs Volume 112: evaluation of five organophosphate insecticides and herbicides.” World Health Organization, March 20, 2015. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.iarc.fr/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/MonographVolume112-1.pdf
  44. US Environmental Protection Agency. “EPA Takes Next Step in Review Process for Herbicide Glyphosate, Reaffirms No Risk to Public Health.” EPA, April 30, 2019. Retrieved June 30, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-takes-next-step-review-process-herbicide-glyphosate-reaffirms-no-risk-public-health.
  45. Charles, Dan. “Safe or Scary? The Shifting Reputation of Glyphosate, AKA Roundup.” NPR’s The Salt, May 30, 2019. Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/05/30/727914874/safe-or-scary-the-shifting-reputation-of-glyphosate-aka-roundup.
  46. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization. “ Summary Report: Joint FAO/WHO Meeting on Pesticide Residues.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization, May 16, 2016. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://www.who.int/foodsafety/jmprsummary2016.pdf.
  47. Jayasumana, Channa, Sarath Gunatilake, and Priyantha Senanayake. “Glyphosate, Hard Water and Nephrotoxic Metals: Are They the Culprits behind the Epidemic of Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology in Sri Lanka?” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11.2 (2014): 2125-47. Retrieved December 17, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945589/.
  48. Gibsen, Kate. “U.S. sides with Bayer in appeal of Roundup cancer lawsuit.” CBS News, December 23, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bayer-stock-up-after-u-s-government-backs-monsanto-pesticide-roundup-glyphosate-in-cancer-court-case/.
  49. USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. “USDA Releases 2015 Annual Pesticide Data Program Summary.” United States Department of Agriculture, November 10, 2016. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from https://www.ams.usda.gov/press-release/usda-releases-2015-annual-pesticide-data-program-summary
  50. The Environmental Working Group. “EWG’s 2019 Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides in Produce” The Environmental Working Group, March 20, 2019. Retrieved December 24, 2019, from https://www.ewg.org/foodnews/summary.php.
  51. Davis, Adam S. et al. “Increasing Cropping System Diversity Balances Productivity, Profitability and Environmental Health.” Plos One, 7(10): e47149 (2012). Retrieved May 30, 2019, from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0047149
  52. US Environmental Protection Agency. “Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Principles.” 55. US Environmental Protection Agency. “Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Principles.” EPA, (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/safepestcontrol/integrated-pest-management-ipm-principles EPA, (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.epa.gov/safepestcontrol/integrated-pest-management-ipm-principles