Court Rules EPA Must Ban the Dangerous Pesticide Chlorpyrifos

by Maggie Tauranac


In a win for food, public health and environmental advocates, this week a federal appeals court ordered the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to withdraw approval for the use of chlorpyrifos, a dangerous and controversial pesticide. Citing studies that show chlorpyrifos is harmful to children’s brains, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the EPA’s decision in 2017 to allow the use of chlorpyrifos is unjustified. This is the next and most auspicious example of a turning tide toward regulating chlorpyrifos.

The EPA’s own scientists have concluded that the pesticide doesn’t meet safety requirements and the agency was positioned to ban use of the chemical under the Obama administration. However, one of Scott Pruitt’s first formal actions as head of the EPA following his appointment by President Trump was to reject efforts to ban the pesticide. Pruitt has since resigned as head of the EPA. The move ignored widely-accepted science and kowtowed to industry interests at the risk of harming farmworkers, children and communities.

Chlorpyrifos was originally developed as a nerve gas in World War II and has been continually associated with developmental disabilities in children, including lower IQ, attention deficit disorders and other health concerns. Yet, efforts to get the chemical banned have resulted in a 10-year battle with industry. DowDuPont, the pesticide’s manufacturer, has fought against any effort to regulate the pesticide and has lobbied fiercely on its behalf. In June, Hawaii became the first state to mandate a ban on chlorpyrifos after an inspiring display of community and grassroots organizing, as well as repeated pressure placed on local politicians.

The EPA has been given 60 days by the court to comply with the ban. Given DowDuPont’s history of denying scientific evidence in deference to profit, their next step might be to push Trump’s EPA to fight the court’s decision. The EPA could request a delay of the ban, ask the Ninth Circuit to reconsider or appeal it to the Supreme Court. Though given the court’s powerful order, it seems that the effort to “protect our keiki” as they say in Hawaii — protect our children — will likely end in success.

More Reading

6 Ways to Get Involved with Food Policy

July 15, 2019

How Restaurants are Adapting to Bans on Styrofoam and Single-Use Plastics

July 9, 2019

The Pollan Family Shares Recipes in their New Cookbook “Mostly Plants”

June 12, 2019

Why Environmental Groups are Suing the State of Iowa Over Farm Runoff

May 23, 2019

Steps to Fight Climate Change with the Food You Eat

May 14, 2019

Can Pollinator-Friendly Solar Energy Work for Bees and Farms?

May 7, 2019

A "Green" Wine Shopping Guide: Biodynamic vs. Organic vs. Sustainable vs. Natural Wine

May 6, 2019

Your Questions About Fake Meat, Lab Grown Meat and Clean Meat Answered

April 11, 2019

This World Water Day, Don’t Leave Farmers Behind

March 22, 2019

Tips for Being a Better Recycler

March 6, 2019